Français
Dining table 4 suggests the outcome of one’s numerous linear regression analyses in which it may be seen the accessibility relationships software is related to just how many people into the genital intercourse, dental sex, and you will anal sex
Dining table dos shows the fresh descriptive statistics (Meters and SD) getting thinking towards the on line sexual routines, level of sexual partners, and you may frequency of condom use in genital intercourse, dental sex, and you may anal sex during the profiles and low-users regarding matchmaking apps, allowing for a comparison of your mean results. The results inform you mathematically significant variations in most of the details but condom volume inside the vaginal intercourse and you can dental sex. Users have more self-confident perceptions with the on the internet sexual behaviors, have had much more sexual couples inside genital intercourse, oral sex, and you will anal sex, and have made use of condoms more often in anal sex than non-users.
Dining table dos Descriptive statistics for perceptions towards the on line sexual behavior, quantity of sexual couples, and you may volume from condom use in users and you may low-users off matchmaking applications, and you will investigations of suggest score
Dining table step 3 screens the latest logistic regression efficiency where parameters connected with matchmaking applications are also examined. The results signify becoming male, being an excellent LGB people, and having confident attitudes to your on line sexual habits is actually associated with a higher likelihood of using relationships apps. Even though this association is deeper with gender and you will sexual positioning than simply as we age and the ones thinking.
However, some interaction effects were also found. Figure 1 shows the interaction effects between gender and apps for the number of sexual partners in vaginal intercourse (F(1, 1790) = 9.943, p = .002, ? 2 p = 0.006), oral sex (F(step one, 2004) = 4.068, p = .044, ? 2 p = 0.006), and anal sex (F(step 1, 943) = , p < .001,>p = 0.002).
Table 4 Several linear regression analyses to choose whether or not playing with dating apps (yes/no) is actually linked to just how many sexual couples
Desk 5 Numerous linear regression analyses to determine if using dating programs (yes/no) is actually linked to the newest regularity of condom explore
Telecommunications effects between gender and you will application fool around with to your number of lovers within the vaginal intercourse, dental sex, and you may anal sex, and you may between sexual orientation and software
In vaginal intercourse, analysis of the simple effects shows that while in non-users, there are no differences between men and women (p = .364), such gender differences were found in users (p = .001). Female users have had more sexual partners in vaginal intercourse (M = 7.21, SD = 3.58) than male users (M = 6.70, SD = 3.72). The simple effects analysis also shows statistically significant differences in the number of partners in vaginal intercourse, both in women (p < .001)>
Desk 5 suggests the outcomes of numerous linear regression analyses in which it can be seen your use of dating software is related to the fresh new frequency from condom include in anal sex. Pages more often explore condoms than non-users whenever stepping into which behavior.
Figure 2 shows the interaction effects found between gender and app use for the frequency of condom use during vaginal intercourse (F(1, 1790) = 4.225, p < .040,>p = 0.002). The simple effects analysis shows that while condom use does not differ between male and female non-users of dating apps (p = .719), gender differences were found among kissbrides.com incelemeyi okuyun users (p < .001).>
Table 6 shows the results of your own several linear regression analyses, hence examined the newest details linked to regularity, what number of minutes relationships apps were utilized, in addition to amount of sexual habits performed which have users. Gender try linked to how many moments relationship programs was indeed used as well as the quantity of sexual routines did which have pages. Having said that, sexual orientation and you will decades was basically related to all of the about three parameters. LGB anyone explore relationships applications with greater regularity and just have involved with significantly more other sexual practices with others they have found using these programs than heterosexuals. Perceptions towards the online sexual behaviors had been connected with how many sexual habits reported by users. Pages with additional positive attitudes into the sexual habits said entering alot more some other sexual practices with individuals they met through such apps.